Member of Technical Staff (Model Behavior Architect)
Generate a McCoy IQ challenge in 30 seconds.
See how candidates think and approach the work this role demands, before the phone screen. We'll build a video challenge from this posting, and you can edit or share it before it goes live.
Key details
What makes this role novel
Model Behavior Architect is a specialized role that emerged with the rise of large language models in production, focusing on prompt engineering, evaluation systems, and behavioral consistency—a category that didn't exist before the recent AI boom.
Job Description
ABOUT THE ROLE
We're looking for a Model Behavior Architect to help build Perplexity's AI products and evaluations. You'll sit within our AI team and collaborate closely with research and product teams, designing prompt and context engineering strategies to deliver high quality user experiences across multiple domains and models.
This role is equal parts craft and science. You'll develop a deep understanding of our answer engine by pressure-testing model capabilities and working across our AI infrastructure (including system and tool prompts, skills, and evaluations) to create a stellar product experience for our users.
You'll serve as a go-to expert on prompting, model quality, and behavioral consistency across new product features and model releases.
KEY RESPONSIBILITIES
- Context Engineering: Design, test, and optimize context strategies and system prompts that shape answer engine behavior across products, features, and use cases.
- Evaluation Systems: Build automated and semi-automated evaluation pipelines that measure model quality, catch regressions, and scale across product surfaces.
- Model Launch Support: Partner with research and engineering to validate model behavior before and during rollouts, ensuring smooth transitions with no degradation.
- Research & Analysis: Identify inconsistencies and failure modes in model outputs through well-designed research projects — for both internal and production-facing systems.
- Cross-functional Collaboration: Work closely with design, product, and research teams to translate product goals into concrete model behavior requirements.
- Knowledge Sharing: Help engineers across teams build intuition for prompt design, context engineering, and evaluation best practices.
- Staying Current: Track the latest alignment, evaluation, and prompting techniques from industry and academia, and bring the best ideas back to the team.
WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR
REQUIRED
- Experience designing evaluations, benchmarks, or metrics for AI systems.
- Strong written and verbal communication skills, particularly in explaining complex concepts to diverse stakeholders.
- Ability to manage multiple concurrent projects in a fast-moving environment.
- Strong experience with Perplexity or other frontier AI models in production settings.
- Demonstrated experience with Python — you'll prototype, debug, automate, and build systems at scale.
- 3+ years of experience working with LLMs in a product or research setting.
PREFERRED
- Experience with A/B testing or experimentation frameworks.
- Track record of improving AI system performance through systematic evaluation and iteration.
THIS ROLE MAY BE A GREAT FIT FOR YOU IF YOU
- Get excited about edge cases in model behavior and love digging into how an answer could be better.
- Enjoy turning qualitative "this feels off" intuitions into quantitative metrics and systematic fixes.
- Want to work at the intersection of research and product, where your work ships to real users same-day.
- Are comfortable with ambiguity and can define what "good" looks like for novel AI features.
- Have a hacker spirit — you'd rather build a quick prototype to test a hypothesis than debate it in a doc.
- Care deeply about making AI more reliable and useful for our users.
Audit details(provenance, verification trail, raw fields)
Core fields
perplexity:9904db61-b8ca-4207-8f93-88ab6f0cd3fdProvenance
perplexityVerification trail
This posting hasn't been probed by our closure verifier yet. Stream C runs on a rolling schedule against postings approaching the close-decision threshold.
LLM enrichment
See how we measure for definitions, or our corrections log for known issues. Found something wrong? Flag a correction.
