Mid-Level Real Estate Associate
Generate a McCoy IQ challenge in 30 seconds.
See how candidates think and approach the work this role demands, before the phone screen. We'll build a video challenge from this posting, and you can edit or share it before it goes live.
Key details
Job Description
Patterson Belknap is seeking a fourth to seventh year associate to join its Real Estate Department.
The ideal candidate will have sophisticated commercial real estate experience acquired while practicing at a New York City law firm with a focus on "dirt law" (leasing, conveyancing, design/construction/development, as opposed to a capital markets or finance background). We are open to considering a reduced hours schedule for the right candidate.
Qualifications:
Desire to work in a small, tight-knit group that offers broad training and gives early responsibility to junior attorneys and offers the opportunity to work directly with partners and other senior attorneys from the outset.
Strong written and verbal communication skills.
Strong legal research and analytical skills.
Careful attention to details.
Excellent time management and organizational skills.
A flexible problem solver, self-directed, client service oriented, and collaborative.
Strong academic credentials.
Must be admitted and in good standing to practice in New York.
The expected salary range for this position is $310,000 - $405,000 per year, pro-rated for a reduced hours schedule, if applicable, plus competitive benefits and bonus eligibility. Associate base compensation at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler is typically lock-step, based on experience.
PBWT is an equal opportunity employer.
If you have questions or encounter difficulties with the electronic applications, please email legalrecruiting@pbwt.com.
Audit details(provenance, verification trail, raw fields)
Core fields
patterson-belknap:MjM1NTh-bXdaTFBjZUcwc0lYcjZHRHgzQk41NjZjMHRWVkhTProvenance
pbwtVerification trail
- unknown2026-07-01 06:43:59Zvia florecruit
evidence
{ "ats": "florecruit", "reason": "ats_unsupported" }
LLM enrichment
See how we measure for definitions, or our corrections log for known issues. Found something wrong? Flag a correction.
