Senior Mechanical Engineer
Generate a McCoy IQ challenge in 30 seconds.
See how candidates think and approach the work this role demands, before the phone screen. We'll build a video challenge from this posting, and you can edit or share it before it goes live.
Key details
Job Description
Engineering moves at software speed. Manufacturing doesn't. Yet.
Machina Labs is changing that. We build intelligent, software-defined factories that produce complex metal structures directly from digital design. By integrating advanced metal forming, robotics, and automated production inside a flexible factory architecture, we enable customers to move from prototype to production in weeks, not years.
Backed by Lockheed Martin, Toyota, and NVIDIA, we're building the manufacturing infrastructure that defense, aerospace, and advanced mobility programs will run on.
If you want to work on hard problems that matter and see them fly, drive, and defend, this is the place.
Job Description:
Machina Labs is seeking a Senior Mechanical Engineer with robotics hardware experience to lead design and integration of advanced manufacturing and mechatronic systems through our robotic forming platform. This role is ideal for a senior engineer who thrives in hands-on mechanical design, mechanism and structural analysis, system-level architecture, and robotics hardware integration.
The Senior Mechanical Engineer will serve as both individual contributor and technical lead, driving the development of complex robotic systems from concept through production. This individual will collaborate closely with software, controls, embedded, and manufacturing teams while mentoring other engineers and helping guide technical execution.
Audit details(provenance, verification trail, raw fields)
Core fields
machina-labs:43f28d36-f797-49b0-88c1-21a58e4c7f32Provenance
MachinaLabsVerification trail
This posting hasn't been probed by our closure verifier yet. Stream C runs on a rolling schedule against postings approaching the close-decision threshold.
LLM enrichment
See how we measure for definitions, or our corrections log for known issues. Found something wrong? Flag a correction.
